INTRODUCTION
While working on a B2B FinTech SaaS platform distributed via the Azure Marketplace, our engineering team rolled out a crucial security auditing feature. The architecture relied on Azure Managed Applications (AMA) deployed directly into our enterprise clients’ subscriptions. To support the new auditing feature, we deployed an Azure Function App inside the managed environment that needed to scan and read metadata from an Azure Key Vault.
The rollout went perfectly in our internal testing environments. However, when we pushed the update to existing customer environments, the Function App immediately failed. The issue? A strict Azure Deny Assignment on the managed resource group blocked the Function App from executing the required Key Vault metadata read action.
In a multi-tenant or distributed enterprise ecosystem, configuration lock-ins like this can halt feature rollouts entirely. This challenge inspired this article, detailing how we safely updated deny assignment exclusions for existing customer managed resource groups without forcing them to tear down and redeploy their mission-critical infrastructure.
PROBLEM CONTEXT
Azure Managed Applications are an excellent mechanism for Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) to deliver software into a customer’s Azure environment while retaining administrative control. When a customer provisions the application, Azure creates a Managed Resource Group (MRG). To prevent the customer from accidentally modifying or deleting the managed resources, Azure automatically applies a Deny Assignment to the MRG.
In our FinTech use case, the MRG contained various compute resources, databases, and an Azure Key Vault. Our new Function App needed to verify secret rotation compliance, which required a specific RBAC action:
Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets/readMetadata/actionBecause this action was not explicitly excluded in the original Deny Assignment, Azure blocked the Function App from reading the metadata, despite the Function App having the correct Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) role assigned.
WHAT WENT WRONG
The symptoms surfaced immediately after our automated deployment pipelines pushed the new Function App code to existing customers. Our telemetry systems flooded with AuthorizationFailed errors.
Our initial diagnostic steps confirmed that the Managed Identity attached to the Function App had the correct Key Vault Reader roles. However, Azure’s authorization evaluation logic explicitly prioritizes Deny Assignments over Allow assignments. Because the Deny Assignment placed on the MRG inherited down to the Key Vault, our RBAC permissions were effectively nullified.
We quickly adjusted the technical configuration of our Managed Application package in the Azure Partner Center. By adding the read metadata action to the deny assignment exclusions in the ARM template, we ensured all new customers received the correct permissions. But this left a critical architectural oversight: modifying the marketplace configuration did not automatically propagate the new deny assignment rules to existing customer deployments.
HOW WE APPROACHED THE SOLUTION
Tearing down and redeploying the Managed Application for existing clients was out of the question. This was a FinTech platform; redeployment meant unacceptable downtime, potential data migration risks, and severe friction for our enterprise clients.
We needed an in-place upgrade strategy. When organizations hire azure developers for enterprise modernization, one of the primary expectations is the ability to handle complex lifecycle management without disrupting production services.
We investigated the lifecycle hooks of Azure Managed Applications. We discovered that the Deny Assignment on an MRG is evaluated and applied by the Azure Resource Manager (ARM) during the provisioning state of the Managed Application resource itself. If we could trigger an update operation on the existing Managed Application instance—pointing it to the newly published marketplace version or an updated ARM definition—Azure’s control plane would reconcile the state, reapplying the Deny Assignment with the new exclusions while leaving the underlying data and compute resources intact.
FINAL IMPLEMENTATION
Our solution required a two-step approach: updating the application definition in the Azure Marketplace and then executing an in-place update for existing tenants.
1. Updating the Application Definition
First, we updated our mainTemplate.json and createUiDefinition.json to ensure the publisher authorizations included the necessary exclusions. In the authorization configuration, we explicitly added the Key Vault action to the exclusions list.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Solutions/applications",
"apiVersion": "2021-04-01",
"name": "[parameters('applicationName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"kind": "ServiceCatalog",
"properties": {
"managedResourceGroupId": "[variables('managedGroupId')]",
"applicationDefinitionId": "[variables('appDefinitionId')]",
"parameters": { ... },
"authorizations": [
{
"principalId": "[variables('publisherPrincipalId')]",
"roleDefinitionId": "[variables('contributorRoleId')]"
}
],
"manageAuthorizationPolicy": {
"excludedActions": [
"Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/secrets/readMetadata/action"
]
}
}
}We published this updated package as a new minor version in the Azure Partner Center.
2. Triggering the In-Place Update
Once the new version was live, we utilized a script to iterate through our existing client deployments and trigger an update. Because the Managed Application resource resides in the customer’s subscription, we coordinated with our clients to run a seamless update command, or utilized our delegated access where permitted.
The update was triggered using the Azure CLI, explicitly pointing the existing application to the new version:
az managedapp update
--name "fintech-managed-app"
--resource-group "customer-rg"
--application-definition-id "/subscriptions/{sub-id}/resourceGroups/{rg}/providers/Microsoft.Solutions/applicationDefinitions/{new-def-id}"Validation: The ARM fabric initiated a PUT request against the Managed Application. It evaluated the new template, recognized the updated manageAuthorizationPolicy, and successfully modified the Deny Assignment on the Managed Resource Group. The operation completed in minutes, no resources were recreated, and our Function App instantly began reading the Key Vault metadata.
LESSONS FOR ENGINEERING TEAMS
When you hire software developer teams to build scalable cloud architectures, they must look beyond day-one deployment and design for day-two operations. Here are the key takeaways from this incident:
- Design Deny Exclusions Early: Anticipate the actions your internal operational tools and managed identities will need. Key Vault access, metrics emission, and diagnostic log configurations are commonly blocked by default Deny Assignments.
- Understand Authorization Hierarchy: Always remember that in Azure, Deny Assignments trump explicit Allow RBAC assignments. If a service has the right role but still fails, check the MRG or Blueprint Deny Assignments.
- Master In-Place Upgrades: Avoid architectural patterns that require teardowns for minor configuration changes. Understand how ARM processes
PUTrequests for state reconciliation. - Version Control Marketplace Offers: Keep strict versioning for your Azure Managed Application packages. This allows you to roll out configuration changes like Deny Assignment exclusions incrementally.
- Automate Tenant Updates: When you hire cloud developers for managed applications, ensure they build automation scripts for tenant upgrades early in the project lifecycle to seamlessly push non-destructive updates.
WRAP UP
Managing strict security boundaries in distributed cloud environments requires a deep understanding of resource management lifecycles. By leveraging the state-reconciliation behavior of Azure Resource Manager, we were able to update the Deny Assignment exclusions safely, unblocking our new security feature without any disruption to our existing FinTech customers. If your organization is facing complex cloud architecture challenges or needs to scale a robust engineering team, contact us to learn how our experts can help.
Social Hashtags
#Azure #AzureManagedApplications #CloudSecurity #AzureMarketplace #AzureDevOps #AzureArchitecture #FinTech #CloudComputing #AzureKeyVault #RBAC #DevOps #CloudEngineering #ManagedApplications #MicrosoftAzure #SaaS
Frequently Asked Questions
A deny assignment is a mechanism in Azure that explicitly blocks users or service principals from performing specific actions, regardless of any roles they have been granted via RBAC. They are heavily used in Azure Managed Applications and Azure Blueprints to protect resources.
No. Deny assignments created by Azure Managed Applications are managed by the Azure system. You cannot manually edit or delete them through the Azure Portal or standard RBAC CLI commands. They must be updated by modifying the application definition and redeploying or updating the managed application instance.
Deny assignments apply to all identities unless explicitly excluded. If the Managed Application's technical configuration does not list the Managed Identity or the specific action in the excludedActions or excludedPrincipals array, the deny assignment will block the operation, even if the identity has Owner or Contributor roles.
Triggering an update (a PUT request) on an existing Managed Application using an updated definition generally evaluates and reconciles the state. For configuration changes like Deny Assignments or RBAC, it does not cause downtime or recreate compute resources, provided your ARM templates are properly configured for idempotency.
Success Stories That Inspire
See how our team takes complex business challenges and turns them into powerful, scalable digital solutions. From custom software and web applications to automation, integrations, and cloud-ready systems, each project reflects our commitment to innovation, performance, and long-term value.

California-based SMB Hired Dedicated Developers to Build a Photography SaaS Platform

Swedish Agency Built a Laravel-Based Staffing System by Hiring a Dedicated Remote Team

















