Table of Contents

    GitHub Copilot MCP long-running workflows

    INTRODUCTION

    While working on an internal developer productivity platform for a large Fintech client, our objective was to streamline database provisioning and log analysis. To achieve this, we integrated GitHub Copilot with the client’s existing automation infrastructure using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The goal was to allow developers to trigger complex N8N workflows directly from their IDE chat interface.

    Everything worked perfectly for simple queries. However, during a stress test involving a heavy data migration workflow, we encountered a significant roadblock. The Copilot agent would spin for roughly 30 to 60 seconds and then abruptly return a “Cancellation response,” effectively killing the request on the client side even though the N8N workflow was still chugging along in the background. This mismatch between client expectations and server execution time threatened the usability of the entire toolchain. This challenge inspired this article, detailing how we diagnosed the timeout constraints and configured the MCP server to handle long-running operations gracefully.

    PROBLEM CONTEXT

    The architecture involved a Visual Studio Code GitHub Copilot Agent communicating with a custom MCP Server. This server acted as a bridge, translating natural language intents into HTTP webhooks that triggered workflows in a self-hosted N8N instance. The N8N workflows were responsible for orchestrating secure API calls to legacy backend systems, processing JSON data, and returning a summarized result to the chat window.

    In this specific financial use case, certain workflows involved aggregating transaction logs from multiple distinct services. These operations often took between 45 and 90 seconds to complete. The expectation was that the developer could ask, “Analyze the transaction logs for User X,” and wait for the summary. Instead, the connection was consistently severing before the data could be returned, resulting in a frustrating user experience and wasted compute cycles on the backend.

    WHAT WENT WRONG

    The issue was not with the N8N workflow itself—logs confirmed that the automation completed successfully every time. The failure lay in the synchronous communication layer between the MCP Server and the N8N Webhook.

    When an MCP tool is invoked, the VS Code client awaits a response. However, network clients and agents often have default timeout settings to prevent hung processes. We identified two concurrent issues:

    • Default HTTP Timeouts: The HTTP client used within the MCP server implementation (connecting to N8N) had a default timeout of 30 seconds.
    • Agent Cancellation tokens: The VS Code Copilot client enforces its own “patience” limit. If the MCP server doesn’t signal activity or complete the request within a specific window, the client sends a cancellation signal to free up resources.

    Because the N8N Webhook node is synchronous (it keeps the connection open until the “Respond to Webhook” node activates at the end of the workflow), any delay beyond these default thresholds resulted in a Task Cancelled exception or a socket hang-up.

    HOW WE APPROACHED THE SOLUTION

    We gathered our dedicated engineering team to brainstorm solutions. We considered implementing an asynchronous polling pattern (where Copilot asks for a Job ID and checks back later), but this degrades the chat experience. We needed a way to keep the synchronous connection alive longer.

    Our diagnostic process involved:

    1. Verifying N8N Execution: We confirmed via N8N execution logs that the workflows finished successfully after the client had already disconnected.
    2. Isolating the Timeout: We used curl with a verbose flag to hit the N8N webhook directly from the MCP server’s host machine. We noticed that curl waited indefinitely, proving the network path was clear, but the application logic inside the MCP server was dropping the ball.
    3. Reviewing MCP SDK Docs: We analyzed the specific MCP implementation (Node.js/TypeScript) to understand how it handles AbortionSignal and request timeouts.

    We realized that to hire software developers who can solve this, you need engineers who understand the nuances of HTTP keep-alives and transport layers, not just basic API integration.

    FINAL IMPLEMENTATION

    The fix required modifications to the MCP Server code to explicitly extend the timeout duration for the specific tool calling N8N. We switched from a standard fetch call to a configured Axios instance with a higher timeout threshold and proper error handling for cancellation tokens.

    Below is a sanitized logic representation of how we adjusted the tool handler within the MCP server:

    // Generic implementation of the MCP Tool Handler
    server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
      if (request.params.name === "run_n8n_workflow") {
        
        const controller = new AbortController();
        
        // 1. EXTENDED TIMEOUT CONFIGURATION
        // Set a timeout significantly larger than the longest expected workflow (e.g., 5 mins)
        const WORKFLOW_TIMEOUT_MS = 300000; 
        
        const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), WORKFLOW_TIMEOUT_MS);
    
        try {
          // 2. MAKING THE REQUEST
          // We explicitly pass the timeout configuration to the HTTP client
          const response = await axios.post(
            process.env.N8N_WEBHOOK_URL,
            {
               input: request.params.arguments
            },
            {
              // Ensure the client waits long enough for N8N to process
              timeout: WORKFLOW_TIMEOUT_MS, 
              signal: controller.signal
            }
          );
    
          clearTimeout(timeoutId);
    
          return {
            content: [{
              type: "text",
              text: JSON.stringify(response.data)
            }]
          };
    
        } catch (error) {
          if (axios.isCancel(error)) {
            return {
              content: [{ type: "text", text: "Error: The request was cancelled due to timeout." }],
              isError: true,
            };
          }
          // Handle other errors...
        }
      }
    });
    

    Additionally, on the infrastructure side, we adjusted the N8N environment variables to ensure the reverse proxy (Nginx) sitting in front of N8N did not enforce a 60-second gateway timeout. We increased proxy_read_timeout to 300s in the Nginx configuration.

    After deploying these changes, the “Cancellation response” disappeared. The Copilot agent successfully waited the full 90 seconds for the transaction logs, providing the data developers needed without interruption.

    LESSONS FOR ENGINEERING TEAMS

    When integrating LLM agents with traditional automation backends, consider these key takeaways:

    • Default Timeouts are Deceptive: Most HTTP clients default to 30–60 seconds. For AI agents interacting with legacy systems or heavy data processes, this is rarely enough. Always configure explicit timeouts.
    • Synchronous vs. Asynchronous: While synchronous webhooks provide a better chat experience (immediate answer), consider architectural splits for operations taking longer than 2 minutes. Return a “Processing started” message and let the user query the status later.
    • Proxy Layers Matter: It is not just the code; check your load balancers and reverse proxies (AWS ALB, Nginx) which often have strict idle connection timeouts.
    • Error Granularity: Distinguish between a “Network Error” and a “Timeout.” This clarity helps when debugging whether the server is down or just slow.
    • Hire for Resilience: When you hire backend developers for workflow orchestration, ensure they understand the difference between happy-path coding and building resilient distributed systems.

    WRAP UP

    Integrating N8N with VS Code Copilot via MCP opens up powerful automation capabilities, but it requires careful handling of request lifecycles. By aligning the timeout configurations across the MCP server, the HTTP client, and the infrastructure layer, we eliminated false cancellations and restored trust in the tool. If you are looking to build robust internal developer platforms or custom AI agents, contact us to discuss how we can support your engineering goals.

    Social Hashtags

    #GitHubCopilot #ModelContextProtocol #N8N #DeveloperProductivity #WorkflowAutomation #BackendEngineering #FintechEngineering

    Running into timeout or cancellation issues when integrating GitHub Copilot with long-running N8N workflows?
    Talk to an Automation Expert

    Frequently Asked Questions